Justice Thomas welcomed an appropriate case to properly interpret the CDA section 230, and my case should be that case.

Image for post
Image for post
Justice Clarence Thomas (left) rendered an extraordinary opinion about section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) which social media companies like Mark Zuckerberg’s (Right) Facebook rely on as a shield from legal liability.

Some say Section 230 (c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act, (“CDA”) gave us the twenty-six words that created the Internet, but “the right to free speech” would be the foundation upon which the Internet was built. Subsection (c)(1) tells us that “[n]o provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as a publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”


Jason M Fyk

Social Media Freedom Advocate. In 2018 Fyk sued Facebook. California courts got it wrong. Now, Fyk is heading to the Supreme Court to fix section 230

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store