proposed “proper” CDA amendment — Section 230 is not necessarily broken. The Section 230 is far too vague, it simply needs to be refined in order to guide the courts to properly comport with the legislative purpose and policy intended for the statute. These are my proposed legislative changes… (C) Protection for “Good Samaritan” blocking and screening of offensive material (“INTELLIGIBLE PRINCIPLE”)

Two diametrically opposed 9th Circuit decisions that can neither coexist nor be lawfully reconciled. Most, if not almost all courts, have relied on “questionable precedent” when considering Section 230 immunity. Courts have consistently rendered inconsistent decisions that are both legally and logically inappropriate, the Fyk vs. Facebook decision being one…

Justice Thomas welcomed an appropriate case to properly interpret the CDA section 230, and my case should be that case. Some say Section 230 (c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act, (“CDA”) gave us the twenty-six words that created the Internet, but “the right to free speech” would be the foundation…